Discussion:
New Jersey Drones - Woman Gets GOOD Photo
Add Reply
186282@ud0s4.net
2024-12-14 01:09:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14189931/flying-drone-invasion-new-jersey-states-live-updates.html

. . .

The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.

A woman in NJ managed to get a quite good photo of
one drone, during daylight hours.

As kind-of surmised from some night photos we're
looking at a relatively wide flat rectangular body
section with short-ish wings. This new photo however
also showed propellers at each wingtip. The props
were kinda large/long ... suggesting relatively low
RPMs. Very little noise reported. Probably an ELECTRIC
drone. The proportions also remind of an Osprey, VTOL,
but these things are more automobile-sized.

Loading Image...
--
033-33
Siri Cruise
2024-12-14 01:48:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
  The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
  at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
How could Iran get and control drones off our coast? It sounds
like what Russia would do, and they can park submarines and
surface ships near our coast.

It is not the Air Force can do nothing. It is a question of what
they could that would not be excessive or endanger Americans. When
you esplosding things in the air, the pieces do not float off into
the sunset. The pieces fall until they crash into the ground and
anything on the ground.

What the government is likely doing is scanning for radio signals
and determining their origins.

Do not assume you know if the Navy is searching for submarines.
They can fly over the area dropping sonar buoys. You would not see
the buoys; you might not see the planes.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Chris Ahlstrom
2024-12-14 11:41:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
  The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
  at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
How could Iran get and control drones off our coast? It sounds
like what Russia would do, and they can park submarines and
surface ships near our coast.
It is not the Air Force can do nothing. It is a question of what
they could that would not be excessive or endanger Americans. When
you esplosding things in the air, the pieces do not float off into
the sunset. The pieces fall until they crash into the ground and
anything on the ground.
What the government is likely doing is scanning for radio signals
and determining their origins.
Do not assume you know if the Navy is searching for submarines.
They can fly over the area dropping sonar buoys. You would not see
the buoys; you might not see the planes.
It could be as simple as a gang of rich kids having some fun.
--
"We're running out of adjectives to describe our situation. We
had crisis, then we went into chaos, and now what do we call this?" said
Nicaraguan economist Francisco Mayorga, who holds a doctorate from Yale.
-- The Washington Post, February, 1988

The New Yorker's comment:
At Harvard they'd call it a noun.
pothead
2024-12-14 14:30:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Siri Cruise
  The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
  at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
How could Iran get and control drones off our coast? It sounds
like what Russia would do, and they can park submarines and
surface ships near our coast.
It is not the Air Force can do nothing. It is a question of what
they could that would not be excessive or endanger Americans. When
you esplosding things in the air, the pieces do not float off into
the sunset. The pieces fall until they crash into the ground and
anything on the ground.
What the government is likely doing is scanning for radio signals
and determining their origins.
Do not assume you know if the Navy is searching for submarines.
They can fly over the area dropping sonar buoys. You would not see
the buoys; you might not see the planes.
It could be as simple as a gang of rich kids having some fun.
That has to be one of the dumbest things you have ever uttered, Chris Ahlstrom.
You libbys will go to any length in order to protect the far left, democrats, Biden, Harris etc.

Liberalism truly is a mental disease.
--
pothead

All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:

Example of Snit trolling in real time:

<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/biFilzgCcVg/m/eUcNGw6lP7UJ>

All about the snit troll:

<https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html>
Governor Swill
2024-12-15 05:03:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Siri Cruise
  The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
  at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
How could Iran get and control drones off our coast? It sounds
like what Russia would do, and they can park submarines and
surface ships near our coast.
It is not the Air Force can do nothing. It is a question of what
they could that would not be excessive or endanger Americans. When
you esplosding things in the air, the pieces do not float off into
the sunset. The pieces fall until they crash into the ground and
anything on the ground.
What the government is likely doing is scanning for radio signals
and determining their origins.
Do not assume you know if the Navy is searching for submarines.
They can fly over the area dropping sonar buoys. You would not see
the buoys; you might not see the planes.
It could be as simple as a gang of rich kids having some fun.
That has to be one of the dumbest things you have ever uttered, Chris Ahlstrom.
You libbys will go to any length in order to protect the far left, democrats, Biden, Harris etc.
Liberalism truly is a mental disease.
Where is the evidence that this is an Iranian drone photographed in the US?
Where is the evidence that it's not a photoshop job?

NP: Roger Waters - Too Much Rope
Siri Cruise
2024-12-15 05:23:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Governor Swill
Where is the evidence that this is an Iranian drone photographed in the US?
It would be hard for Iran to park near New Jersey.
I do not know if China has nuclear powerred submarines, but Russia
does.
We can attack a launch site on our land. I doubt we would attack
Russians in international waters without a very good excuse.
Post by Governor Swill
Where is the evidence that it's not a photoshop job?
Or it is another stupid tiktok stunt.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
pothead
2024-12-15 14:13:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Governor Swill
Where is the evidence that this is an Iranian drone photographed in the US?
It would be hard for Iran to park near New Jersey.
I do not know if China has nuclear powerred submarines, but Russia
does.
We can attack a launch site on our land. I doubt we would attack
Russians in international waters without a very good excuse.
Post by Governor Swill
Where is the evidence that it's not a photoshop job?
Or it is another stupid tiktok stunt.
I took Ahlstrom's statement to include the entire drone affair, not just a single drone
so how could a bunch of rich kids pull off drones all over the country and now the world?
Of course there are people seeing all kinds of things in the sky and no doubt citizens
are also sending up their Walmart drones as well.

As for an offshore ship, in recent days there have been many sightings where I live
and the common thread in these various reports is that the drones seem to be coming
from the south.
Do you know what is south of where I live?
*Very Close* in fact.

The Atlantic Ocean.
--
pothead

All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:

Example of Snit trolling in real time:

<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/biFilzgCcVg/m/eUcNGw6lP7UJ>

All about the snit troll:

<https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html>
Chris Ahlstrom
2024-12-15 12:53:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Governor Swill
Post by pothead
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Siri Cruise
  The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
  at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
How could Iran get and control drones off our coast? It sounds
like what Russia would do, and they can park submarines and
surface ships near our coast.
It is not the Air Force can do nothing. It is a question of what
they could that would not be excessive or endanger Americans. When
you esplosding things in the air, the pieces do not float off into
the sunset. The pieces fall until they crash into the ground and
anything on the ground.
What the government is likely doing is scanning for radio signals
and determining their origins.
Do not assume you know if the Navy is searching for submarines.
They can fly over the area dropping sonar buoys. You would not see
the buoys; you might not see the planes.
It could be as simple as a gang of rich kids having some fun.
That has to be one of the dumbest things you have ever uttered, Chris
Ahlstrom. You libbys will go to any length in order to protect the far left,
democrats, Biden, Harris etc.
Talk about your basic non sequitur.

Paranoid much, crackpot?
Post by Governor Swill
Post by pothead
Liberalism truly is a mental disease.
Ha. I sure wasn't sick enough to vote for a lying toxic clown with a lot of
hare-brained plans.
Post by Governor Swill
Where is the evidence that this is an Iranian drone photographed in the US?
Where is the evidence that it's not a photoshop job?
As a teen I bought a do-it-yourself paper hot-air balloon from Edmunds
Scientific. I and a friend launched it early one evening and it floated away. I
wonder if anyone though it was a UFO.

This was decades before drones, or Dad would have bought me one, no doubt.
--
<dark> "Let's form the Linux Standard Linux Standardization Association
Board. The purpose of this board will be to standardize Linux
Standardization Organizations."
pothead
2024-12-15 14:20:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by pothead
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Siri Cruise
  The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
  at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
How could Iran get and control drones off our coast? It sounds
like what Russia would do, and they can park submarines and
surface ships near our coast.
It is not the Air Force can do nothing. It is a question of what
they could that would not be excessive or endanger Americans. When
you esplosding things in the air, the pieces do not float off into
the sunset. The pieces fall until they crash into the ground and
anything on the ground.
What the government is likely doing is scanning for radio signals
and determining their origins.
Do not assume you know if the Navy is searching for submarines.
They can fly over the area dropping sonar buoys. You would not see
the buoys; you might not see the planes.
It could be as simple as a gang of rich kids having some fun.
That has to be one of the dumbest things you have ever uttered, Chris
Ahlstrom. You libbys will go to any length in order to protect the far left,
democrats, Biden, Harris etc.
Talk about your basic non sequitur.
Paranoid much, crackpot?
Post by pothead
Liberalism truly is a mental disease.
Ha. I sure wasn't sick enough to vote for a lying toxic clown with a lot of
hare-brained plans.
No.
You voted for a dementia riddled Joe Biden who has no idea what planet he is living on.
You feel for the pablum the MSM fed you for years regarding Biden being sharp as a tack.
Sucker!
And then you supported a box of rocks, Kamala Harris, who is not competent enough to
run a lemonade stand or manage to sit through a MSM softball interview without
exposing her idiocy.
And as a result we got 4 years of pure hell and came close to getting another 4.
Take off your pink hat and think about that for a minute or two.

At least Trump has some fresh ideas to fix this mess we are in.
All Kamala Harris had was her statement, on The View of all places, that she wouldn't
change a single thing Joe Biden has done. Or something like that.
That alone shows how far out of touch with the voters she was.
Like I said, a box of rocks.
--
pothead

All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:

Example of Snit trolling in real time:

<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/biFilzgCcVg/m/eUcNGw6lP7UJ>

All about the snit troll:

<https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html>
186282@ud0s4.net
2024-12-16 02:28:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by pothead
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Siri Cruise
  The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
  at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
How could Iran get and control drones off our coast? It sounds
like what Russia would do, and they can park submarines and
surface ships near our coast.
It is not the Air Force can do nothing. It is a question of what
they could that would not be excessive or endanger Americans. When
you esplosding things in the air, the pieces do not float off into
the sunset. The pieces fall until they crash into the ground and
anything on the ground.
What the government is likely doing is scanning for radio signals
and determining their origins.
Do not assume you know if the Navy is searching for submarines.
They can fly over the area dropping sonar buoys. You would not see
the buoys; you might not see the planes.
It could be as simple as a gang of rich kids having some fun.
That has to be one of the dumbest things you have ever uttered, Chris
Ahlstrom. You libbys will go to any length in order to protect the far left,
democrats, Biden, Harris etc.
Talk about your basic non sequitur.
Paranoid much, crackpot?
Post by pothead
Liberalism truly is a mental disease.
Ha. I sure wasn't sick enough to vote for a lying toxic clown with a lot of
hare-brained plans.
No.
You voted for a dementia riddled Joe Biden who has no idea what planet he is living on.
You feel for the pablum the MSM fed you for years regarding Biden being sharp as a tack.
Sucker!
But he DID spell 'hare-brained' properly - most
write 'hair-brained', missing the analogy entirely :-)

As for Biden ... didja catch any of his speech at
a big DNC event today ? Wow ... 99% burnt. Sad,
but sometimes it goes that way.

He DID make one interesting statement however, about
how he's "not going anywhere" ... wonder what it means ?
Post by pothead
And then you supported a box of rocks, Kamala Harris, who is not competent enough to
run a lemonade stand or manage to sit through a MSM softball interview without
exposing her idiocy.
And as a result we got 4 years of pure hell and came close to getting another 4.
Take off your pink hat and think about that for a minute or two.
Yep - senile POTUS and pinhead felon-loving vPOTUS ... what
could possibly go wrong ?
Post by pothead
At least Trump has some fresh ideas to fix this mess we are in.
Plan one seems to be "disruption" of the status-quo.
There's good, and potential bad, in that. I see the
vision as being like trying to renovate an old
historic building - you can't knock down TOO much
at once without installing new supports. It's tricky.
There IS potential for it to all go horribly wrong,
which the Dems WILL try to make happen.
Post by pothead
All Kamala Harris had was her statement, on The View of all places, that she wouldn't
change a single thing Joe Biden has done. Or something like that.
That alone shows how far out of touch with the voters she was.
Like I said, a box of rocks.
Tiny tiny warped brain. If she'd been elected we'd be
doomed - really, seriously, doomed. Note she ALMOST
got elected ... Trump won states, but NOT by nearly
as much as you'd hope for SANE voters. The House -
the GOP 'majority' is about NOTHING. Even one or two
RINOs demanding priority can jam up the whole thing.
From past exploits, Rand Paul and his cadre come
to mind. When votes are tight the minorities rule.

Hate HATE to say it ... but in the end I see everything
going SO polarized, SO paralyzed, that some sort of low
level civil war happens - and then we'll wind up being
run by some general, Fearless Leader, for 40 years.

All forms of 'democracy' carry the seeds of their own
destruction. The People can do STUPID STUFF, vote in
tyrants and fools and enemy sympathizers. The UK has
done a bang-up job of electing fools and more fools.
Now the totalitarians are coming out of their closets.
pothead
2024-12-14 14:32:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14189931/flying-drone-invasion-new-jersey-states-live-updates.html
. . .
  The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
  at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
  A woman in NJ managed to get a quite good photo of
  one drone, during daylight hours.
  As kind-of surmised from some night photos we're
  looking at a relatively wide flat rectangular body
  section with short-ish wings. This new photo however
  also showed propellers at each wingtip. The props
  were kinda large/long ... suggesting relatively low
  RPMs. Very little noise reported. Probably an ELECTRIC
  drone. The proportions also remind of an Osprey, VTOL,
  but these things are more automobile-sized.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/12/13/22/1734129574229_lc_galleryImage_.JPG
A daytime picture. Looks a lot like a V-22 Osprey.
Compare
<https://www.google.com/search?q=v-22+osprey&sca_esv=48cf0eca814055db&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1051&bih=730&ei=MSFdZ669A6Wt0PEP0vDdmAE&iflsig=AL9hbdgAAAAAZ10vQdauTSNred_QO8aB14Iqs7vgqiEA&ved=0ahUKEwjumdvdzKaKAxWlFjQIHVJ4FxMQ4dUDCAc&uact=5&oq=v-22+osprey&gs_lp=EgNpbWciC3YtMjIgb3NwcmV5MgsQABiABBixAxiDATIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABEjhKVDpFljgJ3AAeACQAQCYAUegAbIFqgECMTG4AQPIAQD4AQGKAgtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ5gCC6AC4wWoAgDCAggQABiABBixA5gDApIHAjExoAfINQ&sclient=img&udm=2>
Indeed it does.
It's pretty much a given that some of these sightings are simply normal aircraft.
--
pothead

All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:

Example of Snit trolling in real time:

<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/biFilzgCcVg/m/eUcNGw6lP7UJ>

All about the snit troll:

<https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html>
186282@ud0s4.net
2024-12-14 23:59:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14189931/flying-drone-invasion-new-jersey-states-live-updates.html
. . .
  The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
  at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
  A woman in NJ managed to get a quite good photo of
  one drone, during daylight hours.
  As kind-of surmised from some night photos we're
  looking at a relatively wide flat rectangular body
  section with short-ish wings. This new photo however
  also showed propellers at each wingtip. The props
  were kinda large/long ... suggesting relatively low
  RPMs. Very little noise reported. Probably an ELECTRIC
  drone. The proportions also remind of an Osprey, VTOL,
  but these things are more automobile-sized.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/12/13/22/1734129574229_lc_galleryImage_.JPG
A daytime picture. Looks a lot like a V-22 Osprey.
Compare
<https://www.google.com/search?q=v-22+osprey&sca_esv=48cf0eca814055db&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1051&bih=730&ei=MSFdZ669A6Wt0PEP0vDdmAE&iflsig=AL9hbdgAAAAAZ10vQdauTSNred_QO8aB14Iqs7vgqiEA&ved=0ahUKEwjumdvdzKaKAxWlFjQIHVJ4FxMQ4dUDCAc&uact=5&oq=v-22+osprey&gs_lp=EgNpbWciC3YtMjIgb3NwcmV5MgsQABiABBixAxiDATIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABEjhKVDpFljgJ3AAeACQAQCYAUegAbIFqgECMTG4AQPIAQD4AQGKAgtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ5gCC6AC4wWoAgDCAggQABiABBixA5gDApIHAjExoAfINQ&sclient=img&udm=2>
Indeed it does.
It's pretty much a given that some of these sightings are simply normal aircraft.
Yep. In THIS case, not 'aliens'.

Really looks like a "mini-Osprey".

Could be some uses for such things ... deliver supplies,
comm packages, bombs or even half a dozen soldiers to
kinda remote locations. If mostly autonomous might be
quicker and cheaper than using a full-sized helo.

Anyway, the deep silence about these DOES say "military".

But you'd THINK they'd test them somewhere more remote.
Nefarious intent ?
Gronk
2024-12-18 05:51:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14189931/flying-drone-invasion-new-jersey-states-live-updates.html
. . .
    The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
    at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
    A woman in NJ managed to get a quite good photo of
    one drone, during daylight hours.
    As kind-of surmised from some night photos we're
    looking at a relatively wide flat rectangular body
    section with short-ish wings. This new photo however
    also showed propellers at each wingtip. The props
    were kinda large/long ... suggesting relatively low
    RPMs. Very little noise reported. Probably an ELECTRIC
    drone. The proportions also remind of an Osprey, VTOL,
    but these things are more automobile-sized.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/12/13/22/1734129574229_lc_galleryImage_.JPG
A daytime picture. Looks a lot like a V-22 Osprey.
Compare
<https://www.google.com/search?q=v-22+osprey&sca_esv=48cf0eca814055db&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1051&bih=730&ei=MSFdZ669A6Wt0PEP0vDdmAE&iflsig=AL9hbdgAAAAAZ10vQdauTSNred_QO8aB14Iqs7vgqiEA&ved=0ahUKEwjumdvdzKaKAxWlFjQIHVJ4FxMQ4dUDCAc&uact=5&oq=v-22+osprey&gs_lp=EgNpbWciC3YtMjIgb3NwcmV5MgsQABiABBixAxiDATIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABEjhKVDpFljgJ3AAeACQAQCYAUegAbIFqgECMTG4AQPIAQD4AQGKAgtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ5gCC6AC4wWoAgDCAggQABiABBixA5gDApIHAjExoAfINQ&sclient=img&udm=2>
Indeed it does.
It's pretty much a given that some of these sightings are simply normal aircraft.
  Yep. In THIS case, not 'aliens'.
  Really looks like a "mini-Osprey".
Others also made the V-22 connection

https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/BARKING-New-Jersey-woman-has-a-daytime-drome-picture-/5-2766565/
  Could be some uses for such things ... deliver supplies,
  comm packages, bombs or even half a dozen soldiers to
  kinda remote locations. If mostly autonomous might be
  quicker and cheaper than using a full-sized helo.
  Anyway, the deep silence about these DOES say "military".
No, it says don't do another 50s flying
saucer hysteria. Or Orson Welles.
  But you'd THINK they'd test them somewhere more remote.
  Nefarious intent ?
Like what?

Gronk
2024-12-18 05:47:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14189931/flying-drone-invasion-new-jersey-states-live-updates.html
. . .
  The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
  at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
  A woman in NJ managed to get a quite good photo of
  one drone, during daylight hours.
  As kind-of surmised from some night photos we're
  looking at a relatively wide flat rectangular body
  section with short-ish wings. This new photo however
  also showed propellers at each wingtip. The props
  were kinda large/long ... suggesting relatively low
  RPMs. Very little noise reported. Probably an ELECTRIC
  drone. The proportions also remind of an Osprey, VTOL,
  but these things are more automobile-sized.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/12/13/22/1734129574229_lc_galleryImage_.JPG
A daytime picture. Looks a lot like a V-22 Osprey.
Compare
<https://www.google.com/search?q=v-22+osprey&sca_esv=48cf0eca814055db&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1051&bih=730&ei=MSFdZ669A6Wt0PEP0vDdmAE&iflsig=AL9hbdgAAAAAZ10vQdauTSNred_QO8aB14Iqs7vgqiEA&ved=0ahUKEwjumdvdzKaKAxWlFjQIHVJ4FxMQ4dUDCAc&uact=5&oq=v-22+osprey&gs_lp=EgNpbWciC3YtMjIgb3NwcmV5MgsQABiABBixAxiDATIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABEjhKVDpFljgJ3AAeACQAQCYAUegAbIFqgECMTG4AQPIAQD4AQGKAgtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ5gCC6AC4wWoAgDCAggQABiABBixA5gDApIHAjExoAfINQ&sclient=img&udm=2>
Indeed it does.
It's pretty much a given that some of these sightings are simply normal aircraft.
In this current case I would like to know if
that lady has a video of the sighting (as
opposed to just a picture). That would
definitely settle if it was a V-22. The article
doesn't make mention of sound. Sposeta be
on the noisy side in hover (link has a GREAT
picture of ten of these in formation)

https://www.twz.com/7377/10-cv-22-ospreys-flying-low-in-formation-sounds-like-a-pit-of-hissing-snakes

The V-22 is quite thunderous while in hover,
but when its rotors are tilted forward and
it’s in plane mode it is pretty damn quiet,
and can give off a “hissing” sound as it
flies by. Now take that sound, multiply it
by ten, lower the aircraft’s altitude to
just 150 feet above the ground, and you have
the awesome formation flyby ...
Governor Swill
2024-12-15 05:00:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14189931/flying-drone-invasion-new-jersey-states-live-updates.html
. . .
The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
A woman in NJ managed to get a quite good photo of
one drone, during daylight hours.
As kind-of surmised from some night photos we're
looking at a relatively wide flat rectangular body
section with short-ish wings. This new photo however
also showed propellers at each wingtip. The props
were kinda large/long ... suggesting relatively low
RPMs. Very little noise reported. Probably an ELECTRIC
drone. The proportions also remind of an Osprey, VTOL,
but these things are more automobile-sized.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/12/13/22/1734129574229_lc_galleryImage_.JPG
I suppose it's beyond the realm of possibility that this drone, photographed in
Britain, was one somebody bought or built and was playing with.

NP: Roger Waters - Late Home Tonight, Part I
Governor Swill
2024-12-15 05:07:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14189931/flying-drone-invasion-new-jersey-states-live-updates.html
. . .
  The degree and depth of No Info screams "Govt Op"
  at this point - and not the Iranian govt either.
  A woman in NJ managed to get a quite good photo of
  one drone, during daylight hours.
  As kind-of surmised from some night photos we're
  looking at a relatively wide flat rectangular body
  section with short-ish wings. This new photo however
  also showed propellers at each wingtip. The props
  were kinda large/long ... suggesting relatively low
  RPMs. Very little noise reported. Probably an ELECTRIC
  drone. The proportions also remind of an Osprey, VTOL,
  but these things are more automobile-sized.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/12/13/22/1734129574229_lc_galleryImage_.JPG
A daytime picture. Looks a lot like a V-22 Osprey.
Compare
<https://www.google.com/search?q=v-22+osprey&sca_esv=48cf0eca814055db&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1051&bih=730&ei=MSFdZ669A6Wt0PEP0vDdmAE&iflsig=AL9hbdgAAAAAZ10vQdauTSNred_QO8aB14Iqs7vgqiEA&ved=0ahUKEwjumdvdzKaKAxWlFjQIHVJ4FxMQ4dUDCAc&uact=5&oq=v-22+osprey&gs_lp=EgNpbWciC3YtMjIgb3NwcmV5MgsQABiABBixAxiDATIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABEjhKVDpFljgJ3AAeACQAQCYAUegAbIFqgECMTG4AQPIAQD4AQGKAgtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ5gCC6AC4wWoAgDCAggQABiABBixA5gDApIHAjExoAfINQ&sclient=img&udm=2>
Mystery solved!

Roger Waters - What God Wants, Part II
Loading...